At the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) 39th Annual Meeting in 2006, a seminar was held on knowledge-based Economies (KBEs). The seminar was well attended. The key message from presenters was that developing countries that fail to transform effectively into knowledge-based economies will fall further behind more advanced countries, widening the disparities between developed and developing economies. To succeed in this increasingly competitive and global economy, countries must have advanced information and communication technology infrastructure, a highly educated workforce, dynamic research and innovation programs, and supportive regulatory environment. ADB and its shareholders need to understand the ingredients of the global knowledge economy and develop better methods to help local Asian countries become players in emerging KBEs.
With this in mind, we requested Prof. Dr. Serafin Talisayon of the University of the Philippines’
Technology Management Center to review existing literature on KBE and review country initiatives with respect to KBE initiatives and approaches. Contributions to this paper have been made by Daan Boom, principal knowledge management specialist at ADB; David Sobel, senior results management specialist, East Asia Regional Department; Luigi Bodda, senior energy specialist, Pacific Regional Department; and Jun Tian and Ian Anderson, both advisors, Regional Sustainable Development Department. I would like to thank them for their contributions to this paper.
Shyam Bajpai
Acting Director-General
Regional Sustainable Development Department
Asian Development Bank
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Something new is happening in local Asian economies.
An Indian farmer checks online the latest prices of farm produce, helping him make better decisions—thanks to e-Choupals that connects rural farms to commodity markets in India and abroad. A seaman from Tuvalu sends dollars back to his family—thanks to the Tuvalu Maritime School that builds upon indigenous Tuvalu aptitudes for seafaring. A Shakti Amma, a woman entrepreneur, has reached new income levels, and with it new confidence and pride—thanks to Shakti Community, a rural marketing system that leverages on existing local social networks.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. But teach a man how to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime. Provide him with technology and market linkages and you feed an entire region.
The old development metaphor becomes—using the new language of the knowledge economy—the enhancing human, structural, and stakeholders’ capital. New ideas or intellectual capital, more than savings or investments, are the new keys to prosperity and to the wealth of nations.
An example of how important knowledge can be in the development of countries is cited in the World Development Report of 1998/99. Ghana and the Republic of Korea started off with almost the same gross national product (GNP) in 1960. Thirty years later the Korean GNP had risen
more than six times. Half of the gap could be explained in terms of traditional factor inputs, the other half, according to the World Bank report was attributed to “knowledge” as a factor of production. Although knowledge has always been important for development, the concept of knowledge-based economies (KBE) gained awareness when the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) published in 1996 its report on KBE. KBE is now generally regarded as a meaningful economic concept, one worthwhile pursuing. At the same time it is seen as yet to be a proven successor to the industrial economy.
The past 10 years have seen a wide variety of visions, ambitions, concepts, strategies, policies and initiatives aimed at introducing and advancing the KBE. However, most people involved— both academicians as well as practitioners—would today still characterize the KBE as a largely theoretical concept for economic growth and wealth creation. This is believed to be the case due to the absence of a common—globally understood and accepted—framework for the KBE and a set of measurable models and indicators for successful performance. KBE is however
becoming more and more explicit, but for it to become a full reality, significant progress still needs to be made.
Adding to this, next to all the positive effects of worldwide growth and wealth creation the KBE is envisaged to bring forth, many economists now also point out the potential downsides of such an economy. Downsides are expected to occur once it becomes clear that substantial investments (e.g., in education and innovation) may not always lead to worthwhile economic growth and wealth creation, as new and unforeseen mechanisms—such as the offshoring of
knowledge—may prevent the KBE from realizing its full potential, i.e., of sustainable levels of economic returns and of competitive advantage.
It is gradually recognized that the KBE may well develop, at least to some extent, into a globally disruptive economy for those “welfare” states and companies currently enjoying a leading economic and competitive position. Hence, attention is increasingly drawn to a kind of “leapfrogging” effect, which is beneficial to those developing economies intending on gaining a globally competitive position. This effect occurs once these economies recognize that most commercially viable knowledge is of such a nature that it can more or less easily be “bought” everywhere in the world at low costs, from (highly) educated people, possessing a strong work morale and a flexible attitude. It is even envisaged that knowledge can eventually become a means of mass production—similar to manual labor in the industrial economy—once web-based
information and communication technologies (ICTs) have reached worldwide penetration levels, allowing individuals to work and provide routine knowledge in a virtually networked (global) environment. This situation seems yet to be far off from current-day reality, but many countries in the developing world are making rapid progress to become knowledge-based (Finland, Republic of Korea, Singapore, New Zealand, Taipei,China) and some developing countries
have started initiatives to become knowledge-based (People’s Republic of China, India, Malaysia). These developing countries have drafting plans which enable them to fully benefit from the mass production of knowledge. To counteract this, short-term protection measures
may occur, once countries and organizations find it difficult to sustain their existing competitive advantage. After the initial focus of the KBE on creating an ICT environment, the current focus has moved toward knowledge-based development (KBD) or identifying and realizing the
constituent elements of a social infrastructure which is supportive of the rapid creation, application, and commercialization of knowledge for sustainable development. A durable KBD can only be realized through linking the ”internal social cohesion” of countries to their ability in stimulating, developing, and nurturing education; research and development; entrepreneurship; networks and ICT infrastructure; and provision of seed capital and intellectual property rights.
Over the years, these ingredients have become recognized as being essential for KBD.
Read more:- http://www2.adb.org/documents/reports/technical-notes/knowledge-based-economies/knowledge-based-economies.pdf
With this in mind, we requested Prof. Dr. Serafin Talisayon of the University of the Philippines’
Technology Management Center to review existing literature on KBE and review country initiatives with respect to KBE initiatives and approaches. Contributions to this paper have been made by Daan Boom, principal knowledge management specialist at ADB; David Sobel, senior results management specialist, East Asia Regional Department; Luigi Bodda, senior energy specialist, Pacific Regional Department; and Jun Tian and Ian Anderson, both advisors, Regional Sustainable Development Department. I would like to thank them for their contributions to this paper.
Shyam Bajpai
Acting Director-General
Regional Sustainable Development Department
Asian Development Bank
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Something new is happening in local Asian economies.
An Indian farmer checks online the latest prices of farm produce, helping him make better decisions—thanks to e-Choupals that connects rural farms to commodity markets in India and abroad. A seaman from Tuvalu sends dollars back to his family—thanks to the Tuvalu Maritime School that builds upon indigenous Tuvalu aptitudes for seafaring. A Shakti Amma, a woman entrepreneur, has reached new income levels, and with it new confidence and pride—thanks to Shakti Community, a rural marketing system that leverages on existing local social networks.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. But teach a man how to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime. Provide him with technology and market linkages and you feed an entire region.
The old development metaphor becomes—using the new language of the knowledge economy—the enhancing human, structural, and stakeholders’ capital. New ideas or intellectual capital, more than savings or investments, are the new keys to prosperity and to the wealth of nations.
An example of how important knowledge can be in the development of countries is cited in the World Development Report of 1998/99. Ghana and the Republic of Korea started off with almost the same gross national product (GNP) in 1960. Thirty years later the Korean GNP had risen
more than six times. Half of the gap could be explained in terms of traditional factor inputs, the other half, according to the World Bank report was attributed to “knowledge” as a factor of production. Although knowledge has always been important for development, the concept of knowledge-based economies (KBE) gained awareness when the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) published in 1996 its report on KBE. KBE is now generally regarded as a meaningful economic concept, one worthwhile pursuing. At the same time it is seen as yet to be a proven successor to the industrial economy.
The past 10 years have seen a wide variety of visions, ambitions, concepts, strategies, policies and initiatives aimed at introducing and advancing the KBE. However, most people involved— both academicians as well as practitioners—would today still characterize the KBE as a largely theoretical concept for economic growth and wealth creation. This is believed to be the case due to the absence of a common—globally understood and accepted—framework for the KBE and a set of measurable models and indicators for successful performance. KBE is however
becoming more and more explicit, but for it to become a full reality, significant progress still needs to be made.
Adding to this, next to all the positive effects of worldwide growth and wealth creation the KBE is envisaged to bring forth, many economists now also point out the potential downsides of such an economy. Downsides are expected to occur once it becomes clear that substantial investments (e.g., in education and innovation) may not always lead to worthwhile economic growth and wealth creation, as new and unforeseen mechanisms—such as the offshoring of
knowledge—may prevent the KBE from realizing its full potential, i.e., of sustainable levels of economic returns and of competitive advantage.
It is gradually recognized that the KBE may well develop, at least to some extent, into a globally disruptive economy for those “welfare” states and companies currently enjoying a leading economic and competitive position. Hence, attention is increasingly drawn to a kind of “leapfrogging” effect, which is beneficial to those developing economies intending on gaining a globally competitive position. This effect occurs once these economies recognize that most commercially viable knowledge is of such a nature that it can more or less easily be “bought” everywhere in the world at low costs, from (highly) educated people, possessing a strong work morale and a flexible attitude. It is even envisaged that knowledge can eventually become a means of mass production—similar to manual labor in the industrial economy—once web-based
information and communication technologies (ICTs) have reached worldwide penetration levels, allowing individuals to work and provide routine knowledge in a virtually networked (global) environment. This situation seems yet to be far off from current-day reality, but many countries in the developing world are making rapid progress to become knowledge-based (Finland, Republic of Korea, Singapore, New Zealand, Taipei,China) and some developing countries
have started initiatives to become knowledge-based (People’s Republic of China, India, Malaysia). These developing countries have drafting plans which enable them to fully benefit from the mass production of knowledge. To counteract this, short-term protection measures
may occur, once countries and organizations find it difficult to sustain their existing competitive advantage. After the initial focus of the KBE on creating an ICT environment, the current focus has moved toward knowledge-based development (KBD) or identifying and realizing the
constituent elements of a social infrastructure which is supportive of the rapid creation, application, and commercialization of knowledge for sustainable development. A durable KBD can only be realized through linking the ”internal social cohesion” of countries to their ability in stimulating, developing, and nurturing education; research and development; entrepreneurship; networks and ICT infrastructure; and provision of seed capital and intellectual property rights.
Over the years, these ingredients have become recognized as being essential for KBD.
Read more:- http://www2.adb.org/documents/reports/technical-notes/knowledge-based-economies/knowledge-based-economies.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment